Home  |  Message Board  |  Contact Us  |  About Us  |  Fan Pics  |  Fan Polls  |  RSS Feed  |  Top of Thread  |  Login  |  Register
Display By:
Home  |  Message Board  |  Top of Thread  |  Login  |  Register
Display By:

 

 

Previous Thread   |  Top Of Board  |  Start New Thread  |   Next Thread
bxboro Posted on 11/01/2019 13:58
RUDY GESTEDE
 
 
Not my favorite player but one right out of the Pulis mould .
Rather worried that Tony says the he needs another game for full fitness .
If Tony thinks bringing Rudy back is going to help the promotion push then we are in bother .
IP: Logged
Zoophonic Posted on 11/01/2019 14:30

RUDY GESTEDE

 
Not my favourite payer either but his retention in the squad does not mean we are ďin botherĒ.
IP: Logged
BigmetsBoro86 Posted on 11/01/2019 16:13

RUDY GESTEDE

 
Brought him in ahead of bang on form Bamford last year. That suggests he 'rates' him although he's never getting in ahead of Hugill.

He's a pulis type forward but not good enough at that role.
IP: Logged
Cosmonaut Posted on 11/01/2019 16:18

RUDY GESTEDE

 
If only someone like John Walters was still available and a little younger .. he's a Pulis forward and I rated him, always felt he'd end up here at some point ..

but that has passed ... he was linked with us previously now and then but mostly just paper speculation XXXXXX
IP: Logged
Indeedido Posted on 11/01/2019 17:03

RUDY GESTEDE

 
Walters was indeed a Pulis type player - he was shiiiite.
A non goal scoring workhorse who couldnít trap a bag of cement. Thank God he is injured and between Burnkwy and Ipswich otherwise he might be here.
Useless, but ran around a lot and did what he was told.
IP: Logged
coluka Posted on 11/01/2019 17:15

RUDY GESTEDE

 
Walters [xx(]

The very thought makes me weep
IP: Logged
American_Mary Posted on 11/01/2019 17:24

RUDY GESTEDE

 
When was Gestede picked in front of a bang in form Bamford by Pulis ?
IP: Logged
BoroBen92 Posted on 11/01/2019 17:37
Edited On: 11/01/2019 17:45
RUDY GESTEDE

 
I'd guess he's referring to the final 20 minutes of the play-off semi finals, where he brought them both on but Gestede went up front.
I'd sooner have Bamford coming in from the left than Gestede.

Most other times bringing on two forwards would be seen as a positive thing when chasing a game.
IP: Logged
SimonDavidWilliamson Posted on 11/01/2019 17:43

RUDY GESTEDE

 
Yes he was schite indeedio yet stoke were always competitive under Pulis with him in the team with such a schite forward, and you think Adam Clayton is a world beater - you donít have a clue
IP: Logged
SimonDavidWilliamson Posted on 11/01/2019 17:43

RUDY GESTEDE

 
Yes he was schite indeedio yet stoke were always competitive under Pulis with him in the team with such a schite forward, and you think Adam Clayton is a world beater - you donít have a clue
IP: Logged
capri Posted on 11/01/2019 17:49

RUDY GESTEDE

 
He's one of the most immobile footballers I've ever seen. Even simply moving seems like it's a problem for him.

To think someone actually scouted him and thought, yeah he'll make a professional footballer [cr]
IP: Logged
Witcher Posted on 11/01/2019 17:54
Edited On: 11/01/2019 17:58
RUDY GESTEDE

 
Rudy gestede might be more effective playing with 2 out and out wingers and a little man behind him etc

Simple fact is, he is almost entirely useless in the formation and style Pulis plays, hoofing logn balls to a player who is so technically weak it defies belief, hes a bone idle XXXXXX as well, or at least it appears that way, seems to make hardly any effort whatsoever and is almost completely immobile, hell, he cant even jump more than a couple inches at most and rarely wins header, which is bizzare for somebody who at best your can call a 'target man'

Its staggering that he will cost us in the end north of £10,000,000 in fees and wages and for what, a 'few scruffy' goals, a disgraceful signing since day 1, utter panic buy in January, i have no idea what Pulis sees in him, well i do, hes tall and strong and thats XXXXXX it
IP: Logged
BoroBen92 Posted on 11/01/2019 17:58
Edited On: 11/01/2019 18:02
RUDY GESTEDE

 
It's remarkable how a 6ft 4" striker is somehow closer to the ground when he jumps than when he's just stood still.

I've always hoped he'd come good for us, but I think I've seen him have one good game in 2 years.
Even in the cup match where he provided an audacious assist, he was mostly rubbish bar that.
IP: Logged
BigmetsBoro86 Posted on 11/01/2019 18:08

RUDY GESTEDE

 
Bamfords run in the side and fine scoring run happened when Rudy was crocked. It wasn't a great bit of management it was forced on him.

That suggests he rated Rudy more. You'd have to be blind to agree[;)]
IP: Logged
Witcher Posted on 11/01/2019 18:12

RUDY GESTEDE

 
Its really a mystery isn't it how he continues to make the squad despite contributing almost nothing in Games, i think hes injury prone to hell and got brittle knees because he literally refuses to jump more than an inch

In a way i was gutted that daft flick he done vs Peterborough created a goal, in the back of my mind i was thinking , oh XXXXXX, thats him back in Pulis plans#

I don't think Hugill is that good a player, hes another who has a very poor technique , but hes streets ahead of Gestede, he really is

Gestede contract up in 2020
IP: Logged
Indeedido Posted on 11/01/2019 18:46

RUDY GESTEDE

 
So SimonDW, you agree that Walters was schite.

I've never said Clayton is a world beater, I've just consistently said he should be our midfield anchorman given the alternatives we have.
I don't see why you want to link the two anyway?
I know one of us hasn't a clue, but am even more certain that it's you.
Love and kisses.
IP: Logged
American_Mary Posted on 11/01/2019 18:58

RUDY GESTEDE

 
Bamford started the same games as Gestede, Assombalonga was dropped to play Gestede, Bamford had a history of playing as a wider option in his previous spell here.

At Villa Bamford came on before Gestede, if Pulis prefered Gestede then why didnít he bring him on first, seems to be a revision of reality to suit an agenda with no tangible evidence to back it up to me.
IP: Logged
Heine Posted on 11/01/2019 19:10

RUDY GESTEDE

 
To be fair the game Gestede got crocked in he scored twice
IP: Logged
Witcher Posted on 11/01/2019 19:14

RUDY GESTEDE

 
Clayton a midfield anchorman


Is it really necessary to have an 'anchorman' with 3 centre halfs, play clayton and your then basically a back 6 before youve kicked a ball leaving 4 to support and attack

I like the use of at least 1 deep lying playmaker, no way on earth i would use clayton if i was lining up a back 5, and i'd only ever pair him in a back 4 with somebody who can actually control a game
IP: Logged
American_Mary Posted on 11/01/2019 19:45

RUDY GESTEDE

 
Gestede has started 6 league games under Pulis in a year, he was prepared to let him go in the summer but Leeds turned their attention to Bamford once his Dad had contacted them on his potential availability.

Gestede being a Pulis player just doesnít fit with the selection evidence available.
IP: Logged
Indeedido Posted on 11/01/2019 21:09

RUDY GESTEDE

 
The useless lump is always injured, but when he returns he is eased in as soon as possible by Clueless.

You just spout utter shiite AM about Bamford how Bamford left.
Allowing him to leave would have been stupid, but forcing him out is just special needs.
IP: Logged
BoroBen92 Posted on 11/01/2019 21:11
Edited On: 11/01/2019 21:18
RUDY GESTEDE

 
He's been on the bench for the past two league games and hasn't featured a single minute.
Hardly as soon as possible.

Doesn't sound like Pulis wants to play him tomorrow either from his press conference.
IP: Logged
hopesoboro Posted on 11/01/2019 22:01

RUDY GESTEDE

 
Am I the only one that thinks Indeedido comes across like a spoilt brat?!?
IP: Logged
jcjc Posted on 11/01/2019 22:03

RUDY GESTEDE

 
is a donkey and always will be no skill poor touch and cant head a ball no hold up play
no idea
IP: Logged
AndyD13 Posted on 11/01/2019 22:05

RUDY GESTEDE

 
"but forcing him out is just special needs."

Pathetic. I bet you throw around the word "retard".
IP: Logged
coluka Posted on 11/01/2019 22:09

RUDY GESTEDE

 
Am I he only one who thinks hopelessboro comes across as a tiny d1ck ?

IP: Logged
TomHark Posted on 11/01/2019 22:13

RUDY GESTEDE

 
No definitely not, but to be fair, he is huge in the clown world
IP: Logged
coluka Posted on 11/01/2019 22:17
Edited On: 11/01/2019 22:17
RUDY GESTEDE

 
Tom [:D] donít be harsh though, he lacks a skill many clowns possess, humour [;)]
IP: Logged
Indeedido Posted on 11/01/2019 22:32

RUDY GESTEDE

 
Give over AndyD13.
IP: Logged
Barnsy Posted on 11/01/2019 22:37

RUDY GESTEDE

 
'Am I he only one who thinks hopelessboro comes across as a tiny d1ck ?'

Oh dear, snipping and sniping again.
IP: Logged
coluka Posted on 11/01/2019 22:40

RUDY GESTEDE

 
The pied sniper speaks. He lives everyone.... rejoice
IP: Logged
Barnsy Posted on 11/01/2019 22:44

RUDY GESTEDE

 
Hilarious, as usual.
IP: Logged
hopesoboro Posted on 11/01/2019 22:45

RUDY GESTEDE

 
Whatever floats your dinghy Col![:D]
IP: Logged
coluka Posted on 11/01/2019 22:45

RUDY GESTEDE

 
Sniping ...... as usual [sad]
IP: Logged
coluka Posted on 11/01/2019 22:49
Edited On: 11/01/2019 22:51
RUDY GESTEDE

 
I am almost thinking, hopelessboro, Barnsy, Ticker_Tape are as one for some sad reason [:O]
IP: Logged
Boro_Legend Posted on 11/01/2019 22:50

RUDY GESTEDE

 
Needs to be loaned out Rudy [^][^][^][^]
IP: Logged
American_Mary Posted on 11/01/2019 22:55
Edited On: 11/01/2019 23:33
RUDY GESTEDE

 
Indeedido, you might not like what I say but I can assure you itís not utter sh*te about Bamford and how he left, Iíve posted on here for years same user name which is the only one I have, Iím as transparent as they come, itís up to you if you donít believe it but Iím only passing on what Iíve been told by 3 different people with connections with the club, an ex player, a current player and a member of the coaching staff.

The fact as I keep repeating and if you look through the above said history of FMTTM, Iíve been a massive fan of Bamford and his contribution to the team, I think he should have been our centre forward this year I have no axe to grind with him at all so the information I was given was a surprise to me as well but given it I was and sorry but Iím going to keep posting information I think relevant because in every case itís proven to be correct.

Oh and Iíll make a predicton that Bamford will not be at Leeds beyond this season, heíll be sold or out on loan in the summer.
IP: Logged
hopesoboro Posted on 11/01/2019 23:02

RUDY GESTEDE

 
Sniping at someone in a dinghy?
IP: Logged
coluka Posted on 11/01/2019 23:02

RUDY GESTEDE

 
A_M as one of the most people i respect on here above anyone, PB told me personally TP would not assure him as the number9 and he felt he deserved to be, shame the blame game is so high
IP: Logged
American_Mary Posted on 11/01/2019 23:16
Edited On: 11/01/2019 23:28
RUDY GESTEDE

 
Coluka, thatís the story Iíve maintained all along, Bamford wanted assurances that Pulis couldnít give, words were exchanged both after a match and at a meeting the following day, Bamford asked only to be considered as a centre forward and Pulis told him he would pick the team he thought best to get the result. Bamfordís reaction in training and his Dad contacting other clubs to try and get him a move resulted in him leaving and no one was more disappointed than me that we lost a player I considered important to the club.
IP: Logged
red76 Posted on 11/01/2019 23:23

RUDY GESTEDE

 
Probably on fit for Sunday league at best.
IP: Logged
Indeedido Posted on 12/01/2019 01:09

RUDY GESTEDE

 
I don't doubt you have been spun a yarn by one or two figures close to pulis.
There are different stories. We believe different versions of events.
The truth will out eventually.
IP: Logged
American_Mary Posted on 12/01/2019 07:27

RUDY GESTEDE

 
Sorry Indeedido there maybe different versions of events but as youíve not given yours or identified the relationship of your source to the events itself then itís difficult for me to think that perhaps any yarn thatís been spun is at your end, Coluka, a greatly respected poster on here, has in part, confirmed from Bamford himself what Iíve been telling you all along, so now we have a coach who was there, a player who was there, the ex player who wasnít there but had heard it from the coach and later verified by the current player and then Bamford himself corroborating the same story in part, against you saying itís all just a yarn from a pro-Pulis faction but with no alternative version on what you heard happened.

As a starting point why not say where the version of events you heard differs from mine ? Because as yet nobody has posted anything that doesnít tie in with what Iíve been told happened.
IP: Logged
jenkinsboro Posted on 12/01/2019 07:28

RUDY GESTEDE

 
Wouldnt get a gane for our street
IP: Logged
Heineottosn14 Posted on 12/01/2019 07:47

RUDY GESTEDE

 
Iíd move him on, itís not happened for him at The Boro.
IP: Logged
Wanderingstar Posted on 12/01/2019 08:55

RUDY GESTEDE

 
I am aware from the same source as Coluka that PB was seeking assurances, and not giving ultimatums. Deep down he wanted to stay in an area he enjoyed. His dad's involvement could be disputed, but sounds good, more probable Leeds were told there was an alternative when enquiring about Gestede.
IP: Logged
SimonDavidWilliamson Posted on 12/01/2019 08:57

RUDY GESTEDE

 
AM [^] - indeedio as usual doesnít have a clue [:o)]
IP: Logged
Adi_Dem Posted on 12/01/2019 09:35

RUDY GESTEDE

 
There is plenty of evidence that Pulis prefers Gestede up front. As set out above Bamford only got a chance in that position because gestede got injured. Then as soon as Bamford came on in the play offs he was shunted our wide in favour of a clearly unfit Gestede. Finally thereís the fact he sold Bamford of course.

The Pulis spin that Bamford wanted to go simply isnít true. It wasnít a conversation about whether he would be assured of a certain position in the team. Pulis told him, Iím very clear terms, that he wasnít in his plans and that he would get very little game time. He told him he should find a new club. Leeds came calling and Pulis told senior figures in the club to accept the offer because Bamford would not be playing. To be clear the people in the club were amazed at the decision but were given no option but to back the manager.

It is an excellent representation of Pulisí managerial ability. Poor.
IP: Logged
Nero Posted on 12/01/2019 10:01

RUDY GESTEDE

 
Gestede is as bad as Celab Folan (remember him?).

I honestly can't believe he has made a career for himself as a professional footballer.
IP: Logged
mendieta420 Posted on 12/01/2019 10:12

RUDY GESTEDE

 
Rudy himself says he doesn't like being played upfront alone, so you can't blame him for that.

Before us he was a decent player, had a decent record as a no2 striker but I think injuries have well and truly took a toll on him and a loan somewhere with less pressure would be ideal.
IP: Logged
Wanderingstar Posted on 12/01/2019 10:56

RUDY GESTEDE

 
Adi is absolutely right the Pulis spin that Bamford didn't want to be here really sticks in the throat, but fits his criteria, Bamford was distraught when some of the so called Boro fans booed him as he tried to acknowledge at Elland road, but Pulis had whipped them up nicely
IP: Logged
hopesoboro Posted on 12/01/2019 11:01

RUDY GESTEDE

 
Cobblers.
IP: Logged
American_Mary Posted on 12/01/2019 13:03

RUDY GESTEDE

 
Pulis did indeed tell Bamford he wasnít in his plans and that he should leave as he wouldnít get a game, but that was after the meeting and his attitude in training the following day.

Why did Pulis pick Bamford for every pre-season game if he wasnít in his plans ? How did a simple request for clarification of his playing position lead to him being bombed out a few days later ? And finally why was Pulis the only manager to regularly select him in his starting line up from his last 6 managers seen as being the villain in all this ?
IP: Logged
Indeedido Posted on 12/01/2019 13:22

RUDY GESTEDE

 
You are just sore AM that people don't immediately accept your version simply because you know one or two people who have contact at MFC. People you have n't identified - remotely.
I believe Adi's version of events. He too refuses to name his contacts.
Both of you are entitled - and are perhaps wise - not to, but why do I have to believe your version; especially when I believe Adi has far more credibility as a poster than you.

I would imagine the vast majority of Boro fans would prefer Bamford to be leading our line versus the dross pulis has chosen instead. The only person responsible for that is pulis as he CHOSE to sell Bamford.

SimonDW with his clown faces again. [:X]
IP: Logged
bear66 Posted on 12/01/2019 13:24

RUDY GESTEDE

 
Agree indeedido
IP: Logged
20ellis08 Posted on 12/01/2019 13:31

RUDY GESTEDE

 
''Why did Pulis pick Bamford for every pre-season game if he wasnít in his plans ? How did a simple request for clarification of his playing position lead to him being bombed out a few days later ? And finally why was Pulis the only manager to regularly select him in his starting line up from his last 6 managers seen as being the villain in all this ? ''


1. He played bamford wide left midfield in pre-season and gestede up front.

2.Pulis regularly selected him because gestede got injured, if he didnt get injured bamford wouldnt of played up front and we wouldnt of got to play offs.

So thats why he left, he wanted to be played up front (rightly so) but he was shunted to wide left. Thats not gonna help his career as a centre forward is it ?
IP: Logged
Adi_Dem Posted on 12/01/2019 13:49
Edited On: 12/01/2019 13:54
RUDY GESTEDE

 
The argument that he was central to Pulisí plans and that it was Bamford that caused the problem simply doesnít stand up to any scrutiny. Bamford was picked regularly on the left. He only got a chance up front because of injury. Pulis himself (and this is another measure of the man) in an interview with BBC Tees admitted to being surprised that Bamford could play up front. Thatís having watched him up close. As soon as Bamford got injured he was out the team again. He was ridiculously left out of our play off games. When he came on he was ridiculously shunted out wide so that a barely fit Gestede could stumble around up front. In pre-season Gestede was picked up front and Bamford was shunted our wide again. Pulis told him to find another team. Pulis told him he wasnít going to play. Pulis told the club to sell him.

Any suggestion that this was anything other than Pulis getting him out of the club is false Iím afraid.
IP: Logged
20ellis08 Posted on 12/01/2019 14:00

RUDY GESTEDE

 
no where near as good as bamford but the same thing happened with braithwaite. started the season just off the striker and did ok (maybe because the transfer window was open) . But then for some reason as soon as hugill came he played braithwaite wide left and he spent most games in the left back position. joke really. i didnt think much of braithwaite really, thought he was bang average, but i know where i would of played him and most others would of played him off the striker .... Tony knows best tho ey
IP: Logged
BoroBen92 Posted on 12/01/2019 14:01

RUDY GESTEDE

 
Shocker, an uninjured Gestede is nowhere to be seen in the squad.

But Pulis can't wait to play him, of course.
IP: Logged
20ellis08 Posted on 12/01/2019 14:02

RUDY GESTEDE

 
Hes finally realised hes XXXXXXe.
IP: Logged
Adi_Dem Posted on 12/01/2019 14:10

RUDY GESTEDE

 
The difference is that heís got Hugill now.
IP: Logged
Witcher Posted on 12/01/2019 14:12

RUDY GESTEDE

 
he wont play him because he knows the second he tries to jump for a ball (more than his usual 1 inch) his legs will just break, like they have since he signed

Keep him uninjured incase some idiot somewhere wants to take a punt on him and cover some of his wages in a loan deal
IP: Logged
Wanderingstar Posted on 12/01/2019 14:28

RUDY GESTEDE

 
Pulis clarified HIS opinion on where he wanted bamford to play in his Blackburn post match press conference. He stated quite clearly that he had wanted to try Fletcher in the " Bamford role " wide left, but the sending off spoilt his plans. He only saw Bamford as a wide left player, hence the issue began, and Adi is on the button with the outcome.
IP: Logged
BigmetsBoro86 Posted on 12/01/2019 14:30

RUDY GESTEDE

 
He would be playing if he didn't have hugill who's 3 times the player.

The fact he's not in the squad hopefully means he's off out on loan.

6mil....my god[V]
IP: Logged
jiffy Posted on 12/01/2019 14:33

RUDY GESTEDE

 
If Pulis thinks Gestede has the mobility necessary for a Championship footballer then dont be surprised if he is considering offering Andy Murray a contract.
IP: Logged
Indeedido Posted on 12/01/2019 14:33

RUDY GESTEDE

 
pulis himself said Getede still needs another game to be fit and right for the first team.
He'll be back in the match day squad very shortly.
Unfortunately.
IP: Logged
American_Mary Posted on 12/01/2019 14:35
Edited On: 12/01/2019 14:44
RUDY GESTEDE

 
Yeah thatís exactly what happened, Pulis started him in all the games he could bar the two play off games when he was coming back from injury and when Bamford asked really nicely to play as a central striker but that he would stay and play anywhere he was told well actually I donít want you at the club Iíve had a enquiry from Leeds for Rudi, who you know I love so Iíve told them they can have you instead....seems entirely reasonable when itís explained to me like that.
IP: Logged
Witcher Posted on 12/01/2019 14:38

RUDY GESTEDE

 
Bamford had almost no attributes to play as a left winger, so id be amazed if Pulis thought that was a role he could play

He can sort of play on the right, but thats only because he can cut in and shoot on his left foot, hes a striker, playing him wide is just accommodating, and a winger he will never be, more so on the left
IP: Logged
sheriff_john_bunnell Posted on 12/01/2019 14:52

RUDY GESTEDE

 
Its rubbish that Bamford cant play any position other than centre forward. Itís objectively not true. Both last season and in his first spell he has proven that to be wrong.
IP: Logged
Adi_Dem Posted on 12/01/2019 14:52
Edited On: 12/01/2019 15:15
RUDY GESTEDE

 
Except thatís grossly misrepresentative of what has been posted here and what actually happened. And you know it A_M.

Bamford got picked on the left with regularity. He didnít get a sniff up front unless there was an injury. He came back from injury but couldnít get back in the team because of Assombalonga for some reason and despite an incredible run of form.

He was fully fit and had been for some time by the time the play offs came around. He got 20 minutes across both legs. Having just come on in the second leg he was almost immediately pushed out wide for Gestede.

In pre-season he was back on the left unless Gestede was injured.

It is very, very clear what Pulis thought of him. Pulis then made it clear to both Bamford and the club that he wasnít wanted and wouldnít play.

Any other version of events is inaccurate. Simple as that.
IP: Logged
Indeedido Posted on 12/01/2019 14:53

RUDY GESTEDE

 
Oh that's me convinced AM, because your hanger on mate said so.
The only idiot to have played Bamford LW has been pulis. The only 9 times Bamford started up front under pulis, was because of injury to Gestede and pulis' dislike of Assombolonga.
In those 9 matches, including the one he went off injured after half an hour, he scored 6 times and they were our best results of the season.
Even after having to wait to come on as a late sub at Ipswich, he scored the equaliser and was then benched for the play off matches.
Open your eyes AM.
IP: Logged
Witcher Posted on 12/01/2019 14:57

RUDY GESTEDE

 
Sherrif

bamford can 'do a job' off the right and as a slightly deeper striker, but a slightly deeper striker is still a XXXXXX striker

Hes does not have the attributes to be a midfielder/number 10 and least of all to be a left XXXXXX winger, his games about intelligent movement off the ball not beating players and getting crosses over, he will never be a wideman of any real reputation
IP: Logged
BoroBen92 Posted on 12/01/2019 15:00

RUDY GESTEDE

 
"He came back from injury but couldnít get back in the team because of Assombalonga for some reason"

Probably the two goals he scored in two starts against play-off rivals.

Don't think it's unreasonable to keep him in the side after that.
IP: Logged
American_Mary Posted on 12/01/2019 15:04

RUDY GESTEDE

 
Bamford was in the team....he was getting picked....he said rightly or wrongly that he didnít want to play out wide...Pulis said you play where I tell you...Bamford said no..Pulis said if thatís the case you can go, you wonít play for me again...Bamfordís agent/father rings clubs...and Bamford leaves for Leeds.

Adi is there anything in the above simplified version you would contest ?

Indeedidio, hanger on mate ???? I donít need to open my eyes itís clearly been explained to me what actually happened see above your bias against Pulis has blinded you to reality on this subject.
IP: Logged
Adi_Dem Posted on 12/01/2019 15:06

RUDY GESTEDE

 
Yes. As Iíve set out above.
IP: Logged
Indeedido Posted on 12/01/2019 15:13

RUDY GESTEDE

 
You obviously just don't read Adi's explanation, or any view that is different to that of your insider/hanger on mate.
pulis wanted to generate money, doesn't rate or like Bamford and engineered his sale, deflecting criticism from himself onto Bamford. A stupid decision and sneaky behaviour.
He has previous for both.
IP: Logged
American_Mary Posted on 12/01/2019 15:25

RUDY GESTEDE

 
Adi thatís exactly the story as Iíve been telling it, Bamford saying no to playing wide, and I agree heís the best striker at the club, is the catalyst to all that followed, after the meeting Bamford apparently trained appallingly and it was at that point there was no way back.

Pulis should have handed the situation better, Bamford shouldnít have reacted as he did, culpability on both sides, but ultimately in that situation the manager usually moves the player on.
IP: Logged
sheriff_john_bunnell Posted on 12/01/2019 15:26

RUDY GESTEDE

 
I'm paraphrasing Adi from 2017 witcher. I apologise for being sneaky but it rather gets my goat when people post opinion as fact continually.

I think Bamford was the best striker at the club and should have been playing centre forward for the club. I have no reason to dispute anything AM says. I'm sure either side would put their own spin on it. It was reported that he was knocking on Karankas door wanting to get a crack up front.

I can understand Pulis reasons for letting him go. He needs to look after the team in the best way he sees fit and that may mean players playing in suboptimal positions. I do think its a damn shame though.

Link: from 2017
IP: Logged
Adi_Dem Posted on 12/01/2019 15:27

RUDY GESTEDE

 
And as Iíve said itís simply not accurate. There were no demands to play anywhere. Pulis told him he wasnít going to play, that he wasnít in his plans and to find a new club. He told the club the same thing. That triggered the move. Nothing else.
IP: Logged
Adi_Dem Posted on 12/01/2019 15:41

RUDY GESTEDE

 
Iím obviously a bit dim sheriff because I canít see what your point is or what that link has to do with anything.
IP: Logged
hopesoboro Posted on 12/01/2019 15:44

RUDY GESTEDE

 
On the money there Adi![:D]
IP: Logged
American_Mary Posted on 12/01/2019 15:49

RUDY GESTEDE

 
Adi, he was told he wouldnít play after he said he only wanted to play up front, is the version I have and believe, the source I have I trust implicity obviously you trust yours equally.
IP: Logged
Adi_Dem Posted on 12/01/2019 15:54
Edited On: 12/01/2019 16:09
RUDY GESTEDE

 
Absolutely. No problem here. I have no doubt at all as to the order of events and who prompted it. And you donít either.
IP: Logged
Smog_In_Exile Posted on 12/01/2019 18:08

RUDY GESTEDE

 
Dear Boro,

Please please please get rid of Rudy Gestede

I didn't like him even before he got here when he wrongly accused one of our own of racism.

Give him away on a free.

Pay Sunderland to take him.

Please find a way. 🙏🙏🙏🙏



IP: Logged
Previous Thread  |  Start New Thread  |  Top Of Board  |  Top Of Thread  |  Next Thread



Home  |Message Board  |  Top of Board  |  Login  |  Register


Copyright © 2008 to 2019 Fansonline.net Ltd

FansOnline.net Ltd
Unit 7
Brentnall Center
Gilkes Street
Middlesbrough
Cleveland
TS1 5AP
Fansonline Home | About Fansonline | Contact Fansonline | Advertise On Fansonline | Privacy Policy | TOS
10.0.166.213