Home  |  Message Board  |  Contact Us  |  About Us  |  Fan Pics  |  Fan Polls  |  RSS Feed  |  Top of Thread  |  Login  |  Register
Display By:
Home  |  Message Board  |  Top of Thread  |  Login  |  Register
Display By:

 

Previous Thread   |  Top Of Board  |  Start New Thread  |   Next Thread
TheFair86 Posted on 17/07/2017 19:33
Edited On: 17/07/2017 19:34Palace bid 16m for chambers
 
 
I was kind of hoping he would stay at arsenal a season and we could or a bid in when we go up.

Crystal Palace bid 16m for arsenal defender Calum Chambers
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2017/07/17/crystal-palace-bid-16m-arsenal-defendercalum-chambers/

Link: Telegraph
IP: Logged
myfooty Posted on 17/07/2017 19:42

Palace bid 16m for chambers

 
He will be great signing for them at that price when you compare the fee to that of other fees being paid this transfer window.
IP: Logged
TheFair86 Posted on 17/07/2017 19:47

Palace bid 16m for chambers

 
Yep would snap their hands off to be fair, a lot of years in him and while he makes a few errors so does everyone, good investment
IP: Logged
CiscoKid Posted on 17/07/2017 19:51

Palace bid 16m for chambers

 
If we'd stayed in the prem then I think he would have joined us on a permanent deal. Ah well...
IP: Logged
hopesoboro Posted on 17/07/2017 20:20

Palace bid 16m for chambers

 
How much did arsenal pay for him?
IP: Logged
coluka Posted on 17/07/2017 20:25

Palace bid 16m for chambers

 
Thats what we offered last year before the loan was agreed.
IP: Logged
Afonso Posted on 17/07/2017 22:19

Palace bid 16m for chambers

 
Better player than Gibson & Keane. In today's market if you could get him for less than 20m would be good business.
IP: Logged
HolgateCorner Posted on 17/07/2017 22:23

Palace bid 16m for chambers

 
Another player we developed for another club and got little out of it.

I know Inwould probably be saying different if we had stayed up and then signed him.

But not sure about this loaning of players from top clubs, it seems like a one sided arrangement to me because you are not getting a fully fledged player.
IP: Logged
Norman_Conquest Posted on 17/07/2017 22:25

Palace bid 16m for chambers

 
The Telegraph article says arsenal paid 16 million for him.
IP: Logged
laughingboroboy Posted on 17/07/2017 23:13

Palace bid 16m for chambers

 
Holgatecorner - I get your sentiment, but you have to say Bamford worked for us in the champ as a fantastic loan signing so it certainly can work.
IP: Logged
hopesoboro Posted on 17/07/2017 23:13

Palace bid 16m for chambers

 
Cheers Norman. If he's rated,why would arsenal sell him, effectively at a loss?
IP: Logged
redwurzel Posted on 18/07/2017 09:58

Palace bid 16m for chambers

 
It shows the depth of squads - he never gets a game for arsenal and they paid 16m for him - he is probably worth 20m plus some add ons in this market.
IP: Logged
Anton_Berg Posted on 18/07/2017 10:09

Palace bid 16m for chambers

 
'a one sided arrangement to me because you are not getting a fully fledged player.'

...plus, loaners come with strings attached, they have to play X numbers of games or similar. It ties the managers' hands. This must conflict with a clubs aims of going all out to get promoted or stay in the PL.
IP: Logged
Boromart Posted on 18/07/2017 10:15

Palace bid 16m for chambers

 
"...plus, loaners come with strings attached, they have to play X numbers of games or similar. It ties the managers' hands." -- that's nonsense, they can try and write in clauses that you pay more if a player doesn't play enough games, but most clubs won't sign up to that, because of the impact of injuries or a player having a poor attitude.
IP: Logged
Previous Thread  |  Start New Thread  |  Top Of Board  |  Top Of Thread  |  Next Thread



Home  |Message Board  |  Top of Board  |  Login  |  Register


Copyright © 2008 to 2017 Fansonline.net Ltd

FansOnline.net Ltd
Unit 7
Brentnall Center
Gilkes Street
Middlesbrough
Cleveland
TS1 5AP
Fansonline Home | About Fansonline | Contact Fansonline | Advertise On Fansonline | Privacy Policy | TOS
10.0.166.103