Home  |  Message Board  |  Contact Us  |  About Us  |  Fan Pics  |  Fan Polls  |  RSS Feed  |  Top of Thread  |  Login  |  Register
Display By:
Home  |  Message Board  |  Top of Thread  |  Login  |  Register
Display By:

 

Previous Thread   |  Top Of Board  |  Start New Thread  |   Next Thread
hidewalkamillionmiles Posted on 16/08/2017 13:57
What is it Chelsea don't get?

Report Message | Email Message To A Friend | Reply To Message
 
Think they can get England International and title winner
for 25 million and can sell Matic for 40 million

Maybe they don't realise they got Kante dirt cheap[:D]
IP: Logged
hampshirefox Posted on 16/08/2017 14:09
What is it Chelsea don't get?

Report Message | Email Message To A Friend | Reply To Message 

 
They are dealing with Rudkin remember..."32m for Kante, I'll go get my pen"
IP: Logged
youlittleripper Posted on 16/08/2017 14:19
What is it Chelsea don't get?

Report Message | Email Message To A Friend | Reply To Message 

 
Anybody else find it odd that pundits and posters every single time fail to see the reason kante was sold for 30 million is because that was his buyout clause. Simple. It was taken out of our hands a year earlier when the brains trust of Rudkin and the like allowed it to be added as a condition into his contract.

As good as Drinkwater might be considered in most people's eyes 30-35 million is all he is worth at best. Forget what Matic went for - he is simply a better player.
IP: Logged
Anstonian Posted on 16/08/2017 14:34
What is it Chelsea don't get?

Report Message | Email Message To A Friend | Reply To Message 

 
I think Chelsea are probably playing long game and setting up for a "final" 30mill bid on deadline day.

If they had offered 30m straight away we would have turned it down. Think it is the same game Roma are trying to play with Mahrez.
IP: Logged
yorkfox Posted on 16/08/2017 14:37
What is it Chelsea don't get?

Report Message | Email Message To A Friend | Reply To Message 

 
Drinkwater is almost two years younger and English qualified though.
IP: Logged
sixthswan Posted on 16/08/2017 14:38
What is it Chelsea don't get?

Report Message | Email Message To A Friend | Reply To Message 

 
I don't think we made a mistake with the Kante buy-out clause? If he insisted on it and we had said no - we would have never won the Premier League.

He has made it clear that at the time Leicester were showing interest, his personal preference was a move to MXXXXXXilles.

I'm pretty certain that the buy-out clause swayed him.
IP: Logged
Daz40 Posted on 16/08/2017 14:40
What is it Chelsea don't get?

Report Message | Email Message To A Friend | Reply To Message 

 
problem is ylr no one expected Kante to be as good as he is that's why only 35 million was put in the clause.
IP: Logged
hampshirefox Posted on 16/08/2017 15:02
What is it Chelsea don't get?

Report Message | Email Message To A Friend | Reply To Message 

 
I think you'll find Kantes buy out was only 25m which is why we went scurrying to Sven to make a bogus bid.
We are amateurs in this game.
IP: Logged
Philpott_Fogg Posted on 16/08/2017 15:12
What is it Chelsea don't get?

Report Message | Email Message To A Friend | Reply To Message 

 
Bang on sixthswan, I agree 100%. What is more, the buyout clause was 600% of what we paid for him. Who could possibly have imagined that he would play so well that it would seem cheap one year later?
IP: Logged
hackneyfox Posted on 16/08/2017 15:22
What is it Chelsea don't get?

Report Message | Email Message To A Friend | Reply To Message 

 
The buy-out clause was 20m.
IP: Logged
LGFOX Posted on 16/08/2017 15:28
What is it Chelsea don't get?

Report Message | Email Message To A Friend | Reply To Message 

 
Hackney is right. 20M. What I was amazed at was why Chelsea were the only PL team to come in for him. We were lucky to get 32M.
IP: Logged
Mustapha_Teabreak Posted on 16/08/2017 15:40
What is it Chelsea don't get?

Report Message | Email Message To A Friend | Reply To Message 

 
Is the answer because they'd all been listening to the Spurs loving media and believe we were lucky rather than having good players?
IP: Logged
sixthswan Posted on 16/08/2017 16:11
What is it Chelsea don't get?

Report Message | Email Message To A Friend | Reply To Message 

 
N'Golo is still the 47th most expensive Premier League player of all-time. Of those to move to an English club.

At the time we sold him, he was just outside the top 30 highest fees ever paid.

The only annoyance was that a few lesser players commanded a higher fee in the same pre-season...
IP: Logged
StalybridgeFox Posted on 16/08/2017 16:24
What is it Chelsea don't get?

Report Message | Email Message To A Friend | Reply To Message 

 
Spurs were busy blowing 30 mil on Sissoko! Shrewd Levy eh!!
IP: Logged
TheCraftyOldFox Posted on 16/08/2017 22:38
What is it Chelsea don't get?

Report Message | Email Message To A Friend | Reply To Message 

 
Unbelievable to think that we probably originally only bought him to be a squad player ! ....
IP: Logged
hackneyfox Posted on 16/08/2017 23:34
What is it Chelsea don't get?

Report Message | Email Message To A Friend | Reply To Message 

 
Daz
So '35 million was put in the clause'and we sold him for 32.

Great work
IP: Logged
Previous Thread  |  Start New Thread  |  Top Of Board  |  Top Of Thread  |  Next Thread



Home  |Message Board  |  Top of Board  |  Login  |  Register


Copyright © 2008 to 2017 Fansonline.net Ltd

FansOnline.net Ltd
Unit 7
Brentnall Center
Gilkes Street
Middlesbrough
Cleveland
TS1 5AP
Fansonline Home | About Fansonline | Contact Fansonline | Advertise On Fansonline | Privacy Policy | TOS
10.0.166.103